Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Encore! Encore!

Alex Ovechkin sure did have a nice 2007-08 season, but now that the hardware has headed back to Toronto and the player they will honor for the next year(s) has headed back to Russia, we can wholeheartedly turn our gaze to 2008-09 and ask, "What's next?" While the sky may not even be a high enough limit for Alex, a look back at how former Hart Trophy winners followed up their MVP seasons may provide a baseline for reasonable expectations.

The NHL has handed out the Hart 40 times in what most consider to be the sport's "modern era," that is, since the 1967 expansion. The average stats of the 37 non-goalie Hart winners over that span is 76.86 games played, 50.97 goals and 87.22 assists (75.89 if you don't include Wayne Gretzky's nine MVP seasons, during which he averaged 121.22 helpers). AO's award-winning season, of course, saw him play all 82 and rack up 65 goals and 47 assists along the way.

So what did the previous 36 winners do for Act II (and Act III in Bobby Orr's case and Acts III-VIII in Gretz's)? One-third of them scored more goals-per-game than in their Hart-winning season (and twice for Orr and four times for Gretzky these follow-up seasons earned another Hart), 15 of them had more assists-per-game (earning back-to-back Harts for Orr, Bobby Clarke and Gretzky six times), and one-third had more points per game (Orr, Clarke and Gretzky four times turned these increases into consecutive Harts).

On average, however, production decreased across the board (which is not surprising given that it's difficult to improve upon what is for many a career season). The average Hart winner has seen his games played drop by 7.86%, his goals-per-game falls by 9.43% and his assists-per-game declines by 5.45%.

Unlike Ovechkin, though, many of the previous Hart winners were already well into (or perhaps past) their prime playing years when they won the award. Only two other players since 1967-68 have won the Hart in their third years in the League, and both improved the following season - Gretzky won the award with a 55-goal/109-assist campaign and came back with 92 goals, 120 assists and this killer SI cover the next year (and a half-dozen more MVPs in a row); and Eric Lindros was the Hart winner in the strike-shortened 1994-95 season (which was really just the 1995 season), and bumped his per game and raw goal and assist totals up a bit the following season.

Drilling a little deeper on players winning the Hart early in their careers, Ovechkin was the 11th player since 1967-68 to win the award in his 22-year-old season (age as of February 1 of the given season) or earlier. Of the previous ten, seven had more goals-per-game the following year (only Bryan Trottier in 1978-79, Gretzky in 1981-82 - what, couldn't top 92? - and Sidney Crosby this past year did not) and seven had more assists-per-game in that second year (only Orr in 1970-71, Trottier in 1978-79 and Crosby in 2007-08 did not). All told, the average under-23 Hart winner followed up his big season with 8.31% more goals (9% more per game) and 5.54% more assists (6.6% more per game) in 1.22% fewer games, and six of the ten have increased their points-per-game.

So what should we expect from Ovechkin in 2008-09? Applying the 36-player averages, he regresses to 54 goals and 40 assists in 75 games (bump it up to 58 goals and 44 assists if Ovie plays his third-straight 82-game season). Taking just the averages from the 10-player 22-and-under subset (a smaller but likely more representative sample), we'd expect 69 goals and 49 assists in 81 games. I'd buy that. You?

One last note: ten times in the modern era (but not since the late '80s), a Hart Trophy winner's team won the following year's Stanley Cup, and we all know which hardware Alex Ovechkin would rather be posing with one year from now.

7 comments:

FAUX RUMORS said...

1) Probably asking a lot to expect a Hart/Pearson/Ross/Richard every year, but a 50 goal/90+ point year is what most fans expect, and what the team will need to continue to succeed.

NS said...

the more talent there is around AO, the more space and points he's going to rack up. the Caps are still strengthening the gaps around him.

if he's still going to get smothered, which he is, he can make plays to talented linemates and rack up the assists. so....anyone know a talented RW???

will be interesting to see who Bouds centers AO with (if Federov signs) and if he sticks with the all Russian line of the Worlds. probably not...

oh yeah, forgot about Nylander. whoops.

I would be a little (not a lot) surprised if AO tops his point totals of last season. Semin will take his fare share of goals (hopefully) and we must have some other players step up.

~Mark said...

I started a similar thread yesterday on the Caps msg boards, related to the Hart/Cup relationship:
http://boards.washingtoncaps.com/index.php?showtopic=72263
Check it out!

JR said...

I'm sure a 54-40 season next year would result in a rating of "2" since winning four trophies and scoring 65 only merits an 8 or 9 of 10 in some people's minds. :-)

bigonetimer said...

JR-good point. It's interesting how quickly we can get spoiled.

Barring injury, I don't see anything less than 100+ pts from AO for the next several years; line him up with a healthy Nylander or Feds, plus an upgrade over Koz next year, and 70/70/+30 is (gasp) very realistic...gives me goosebumps just thinking about it

Kim said...

Personally I would not mess with the Ovechkin Backstrom chemistry at the beginning of the season. They really seem to have connected. However, it is great that we could have the potential for three top Centers that could be interchanged on the top two lines depending on the opponent, game circumstances, etc.

Just thinking about the possibility of mixing all of the players on two PP units gives me goosebumps.

Sombrero Guy said...

Agreed. I would rather see Backstrom and Ovechkin together.

Nylander or Fedorov with Semin. Two very balanced scoring lines.

The fun really begins when you stick any combination of Ovechkin, Backstrom, Nylander, Semin, Fedorov and Green on the same PP.